HyperTeamsHyperTeamsvsAmp
The coding agent from the company spun out of Sourcegraph.
HyperTeamsSix cells, side by side
Written to the same standard — no column favours our row.
Many agents at once
Not a pile of windows — several tasks running together on one screen, each with a visible state.
Isolated per task
Each task gets its own worktree or sandbox, so parallel runs never step on each other's files.
Finishes without a watcher
It keeps going without an approval at every step, then notifies you or picks up the next job.
Starts on its own
Recurring work — every morning, every Friday — starts at its time with nobody at the keyboard.
Follow it from your phone
Away from the desk you can still see progress, queue the next instruction and read the result.
Your choice of agent
Not locked to one vendor's model — pick Claude Code, Codex and others per task.
Reading Amp
An agent with strong code understanding from the Sourcegraph lineage, with threads shared across a team.
The agent is Amp's, and there are no scheduled runs.
Deep code exploration in Amp; several engines on one board in HyperTeams.
Where both stand on the map
Across: who does the work. Up: how many things run at once. No dot was placed by hand — each position is computed from its row in the table below.
Other tools in this category
From an editor you watch to an environment you delegate to
Keep your editor. HyperTeams runs the agent team next to it.What this page says about Amp was checked against its official docs as of 2026-09-27.
curl -fsSL https://hyperteams.net/install.sh | bash