HyperTeamsHyperTeamsvsConductor
A Mac app that runs coding agents in parallel, one worktree each.
HyperTeamsSix cells, side by side
Written to the same standard — no column favours our row.
Many agents at once
Not a pile of windows — several tasks running together on one screen, each with a visible state.
Isolated per task
Each task gets its own worktree or sandbox, so parallel runs never step on each other's files.
Finishes without a watcher
It keeps going without an approval at every step, then notifies you or picks up the next job.
Starts on its own
Recurring work — every morning, every Friday — starts at its time with nobody at the keyboard.
Follow it from your phone
Away from the desk you can still see progress, queue the next instruction and read the result.
Your choice of agent
Not locked to one vendor's model — pick Claude Code, Codex and others per task.
Reading Conductor
A branch and worktree per task, then diff review, checks and PR merge — all in one app.
Mac only. Continuing after you close it moves to paid cloud workspaces, and the phone app is still coming.
Conductor for the code loop that ends in a PR; HyperTeams for while you're away, on a schedule and from your phone.
Where both stand on the map
Across: who does the work. Up: how many things run at once. No dot was placed by hand — each position is computed from its row in the table below.
There is a deeper 1:1 comparison
Where they split, situation by situation, how to use both without switching, and an FAQ.
From an editor you watch to an environment you delegate to
Keep your editor. HyperTeams runs the agent team next to it.What this page says about Conductor was checked against its official docs as of 2026-09-27.
curl -fsSL https://hyperteams.net/install.sh | bash