HyperTeamsHyperTeamsvsPaseo
An open-source 'control plane for coding agents': one daemon, with desktop, phone and web clients.
HyperTeamsSix cells, side by side
Written to the same standard — no column favours our row.
Many agents at once
Not a pile of windows — several tasks running together on one screen, each with a visible state.
Isolated per task
Each task gets its own worktree or sandbox, so parallel runs never step on each other's files.
Finishes without a watcher
It keeps going without an approval at every step, then notifies you or picks up the next job.
Starts on its own
Recurring work — every morning, every Friday — starts at its time with nobody at the keyboard.
Follow it from your phone
Away from the desk you can still see progress, queue the next instruction and read the result.
Your choice of agent
Not locked to one vendor's model — pick Claude Code, Codex and others per task.
Reading Paseo
One daemon with desktop, phone, web and CLI clients. Open source, with scheduled runs.
Focused on launching and following agents; grading results and continuing on its own is partial.
HyperTeams when results should become shareable links, show cost per task and be pushed through by a judge.
Where both stand on the map
Across: who does the work. Up: how many things run at once. No dot was placed by hand — each position is computed from its row in the table below.
There is a deeper 1:1 comparison
Where they split, situation by situation, how to use both without switching, and an FAQ.
From an editor you watch to an environment you delegate to
Keep your editor. HyperTeams runs the agent team next to it.What this page says about Paseo was checked against its official docs as of 2026-09-27.
curl -fsSL https://hyperteams.net/install.sh | bash